<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bookmarx</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tommymarx.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tommymarx.com</link>
	<description>Random thoughts for a random world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:18:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on What is the difference between God and a postage stamp? by Deb</title>
		<link>http://tommymarx.com/?p=485&#038;cpage=1#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommymarx.com/?p=485#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Interesting, but I already knew the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, but I already knew the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jon Cryer speaks out against gays by pornhub</title>
		<link>http://tommymarx.com/?p=166&#038;cpage=1#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>pornhub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 06:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommymarx.com/?p=166#comment-504</guid>
		<description>Some things are just unnatural though for human beings..It&#039;s okay for a person to love another, but having sex with the same gender can not be justified.  It simply does not make any sense for humans. I think Jon Cryer&#039;s just sticking to his character and there&#039;s nothing wrong with that.  He&#039;s looking at what he believes about acting.  Maybe he hates gays or maybe he just notices an actors flaws/strengths in a different way.. A woman would have a hard time acting like a man...some may act better than others, but obviously gender would make things easier for this example..  I think Cryer is just looking at the audience and what they believe.  Will the audience buy into this character&#039;s instinct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some things are just unnatural though for human beings..It&#8217;s okay for a person to love another, but having sex with the same gender can not be justified.  It simply does not make any sense for humans. I think Jon Cryer&#8217;s just sticking to his character and there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that.  He&#8217;s looking at what he believes about acting.  Maybe he hates gays or maybe he just notices an actors flaws/strengths in a different way.. A woman would have a hard time acting like a man&#8230;some may act better than others, but obviously gender would make things easier for this example..  I think Cryer is just looking at the audience and what they believe.  Will the audience buy into this character&#8217;s instinct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on American Idol Top Twelve: 03-16-10 by Heath</title>
		<link>http://tommymarx.com/?p=444&#038;cpage=1#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommymarx.com/?p=444#comment-448</guid>
		<description>Siobhan is my girl - definitely rooting for her to win this or at a minimum be in the Top 3.

Glad to see she got a 9 out of 10 (and that Lee got an 8 -  you know how we feel about him).

And like you, Siobhan (and Lee) is my reason for watching/caring at all this season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Siobhan is my girl &#8211; definitely rooting for her to win this or at a minimum be in the Top 3.</p>
<p>Glad to see she got a 9 out of 10 (and that Lee got an 8 &#8211;  you know how we feel about him).</p>
<p>And like you, Siobhan (and Lee) is my reason for watching/caring at all this season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jon Cryer speaks out against gays by pork</title>
		<link>http://tommymarx.com/?p=166&#038;cpage=1#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>pork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommymarx.com/?p=166#comment-333</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t give a flying fuck if your hetro (i belong here by the way), homo, bi or whatever but the truth is... If your a good male/female actor than that&#039;s what you are and your sexuality will not make you any worse or better.

Just look at Jonathan Slavin. The man is playing a stright scientist when he acts completely gay and you don&#039;t believe Slavin acting one fucking beat. Guess what? That&#039;s not because the man is gay, it&#039;s because he is an awful actor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t give a flying fuck if your hetro (i belong here by the way), homo, bi or whatever but the truth is&#8230; If your a good male/female actor than that&#8217;s what you are and your sexuality will not make you any worse or better.</p>
<p>Just look at Jonathan Slavin. The man is playing a stright scientist when he acts completely gay and you don&#8217;t believe Slavin acting one fucking beat. Guess what? That&#8217;s not because the man is gay, it&#8217;s because he is an awful actor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jon Cryer speaks out against gays by sally ferguson</title>
		<link>http://tommymarx.com/?p=166&#038;cpage=1#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>sally ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommymarx.com/?p=166#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Neil Patrick Harris is gay?  I&#039;ve got nothing against gay anything, but he&#039;s kind of got a point.  I love Ellen Degenerous, but I&#039;d never find her portrayal of a straight woman the least bit believable or enjoyable and let&#039;s be honest, Jack and Sawyer wouldn&#039;t be nearly as enjoyable to watch on that island if we knew they&#039;d rather be chasing each other instead of Kate.  ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil Patrick Harris is gay?  I&#8217;ve got nothing against gay anything, but he&#8217;s kind of got a point.  I love Ellen Degenerous, but I&#8217;d never find her portrayal of a straight woman the least bit believable or enjoyable and let&#8217;s be honest, Jack and Sawyer wouldn&#8217;t be nearly as enjoyable to watch on that island if we knew they&#8217;d rather be chasing each other instead of Kate.  ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on President Obama &#8220;acted stupidly&#8221; by dave</title>
		<link>http://tommymarx.com/?p=159&#038;cpage=1#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommymarx.com/?p=159#comment-112</guid>
		<description>You and I do not see eye to eye on this.  Now I know why you apologized when you wrote of your dissapointment on my blog.  I respect your viewpoint, but it makes me a little bit sad that you and I don&#039;t agree on this.  Agree to disagree, perhaps?  

Here&#039;s my take.  I actually think the President responded well to this story by criticzing the police, although I fault the judgment of the particular police officer, not the police force as a whole.  And today I learned that the officer, Sargent Crowley, has taught law enforcement how to avoid racial profiling for five years, which makes me wonder where his good judgment went.  I understand what you are saying about not finding fault, yet at the same time, race is all intertwined in this story.  For one, I have doubts the neighbor would&#039;ve called if the owner of the house was white and she saw two white guys trying to open the jammed door.  I don&#039;t really fault the neighbor, although it&#039;s odd that she didn&#039;t know her own neighbor.  Judging from the photos, this happened in daylight, so it&#039;s not like she couldn&#039;t see clearly who the people were.  But anyway, I have doubts the cop would&#039;ve responded in exactly the same way to the person who answered the door, if that person was white.  In other words, would the officer have assumed that the guy answering the door is a suspect, or the owner of the house?  That&#039;s where we disagree.  You think this isn&#039;t a race issue, saying that it would still happen if Gates was white, but I disagree.  Even if the suspects were white, I think if Mr. Gates was a white man answering the door of his own house, the officer would assume that he was the owner of the house.  There is no way to know for sure how this would play out, but I wouldn&#039;t automatically assume it would play out the same.  I don&#039;t draw conclusions either that President Obama only has your back if you&#039;re black, (or brown).  

The main problem I have with this is that after if was established that Mr Gates was in fact the owner of the house, 1.)the cop refused to give his name and badge number when asked, and 2.) There were charges against Gates, (although they were finally dropped on Tuesday, which was five days after the incident, and 3.) the cop refused to apologize for the siuation, even after a week, and even after the charges were dropped, and 4.) the cop arrested and handcuffed a 5&#039;6&quot;, 150 black man who needs a cane to walk, because he was angry and &quot;disturbing the peace&quot; and &quot;exhibiting loud and tumultuous behavior, in a public place&quot;.  I don&#039;t get how someone&#039;s front porch qualifies as a public place, and since when is being rightfully upset and critical of police action a reason for arrest?
Granted I wasn&#039;t there, but I don&#039;t think that was a necessary action for the cop to take.  It was extreme to arrest and handcuff a small black man in his own home after he already proved he was the owner and wasn&#039;t getting an apology or identification from the cop.  And Crowley is still sticking with &quot;I won&#039;t apologize because I don&#039;t believe I need to apologize for anything.&quot;  If he admitted he made a mistake and offered an apology, I&#039;d rethink things, but for now he comes off as an arrogant asshole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You and I do not see eye to eye on this.  Now I know why you apologized when you wrote of your dissapointment on my blog.  I respect your viewpoint, but it makes me a little bit sad that you and I don&#8217;t agree on this.  Agree to disagree, perhaps?  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my take.  I actually think the President responded well to this story by criticzing the police, although I fault the judgment of the particular police officer, not the police force as a whole.  And today I learned that the officer, Sargent Crowley, has taught law enforcement how to avoid racial profiling for five years, which makes me wonder where his good judgment went.  I understand what you are saying about not finding fault, yet at the same time, race is all intertwined in this story.  For one, I have doubts the neighbor would&#8217;ve called if the owner of the house was white and she saw two white guys trying to open the jammed door.  I don&#8217;t really fault the neighbor, although it&#8217;s odd that she didn&#8217;t know her own neighbor.  Judging from the photos, this happened in daylight, so it&#8217;s not like she couldn&#8217;t see clearly who the people were.  But anyway, I have doubts the cop would&#8217;ve responded in exactly the same way to the person who answered the door, if that person was white.  In other words, would the officer have assumed that the guy answering the door is a suspect, or the owner of the house?  That&#8217;s where we disagree.  You think this isn&#8217;t a race issue, saying that it would still happen if Gates was white, but I disagree.  Even if the suspects were white, I think if Mr. Gates was a white man answering the door of his own house, the officer would assume that he was the owner of the house.  There is no way to know for sure how this would play out, but I wouldn&#8217;t automatically assume it would play out the same.  I don&#8217;t draw conclusions either that President Obama only has your back if you&#8217;re black, (or brown).  </p>
<p>The main problem I have with this is that after if was established that Mr Gates was in fact the owner of the house, 1.)the cop refused to give his name and badge number when asked, and 2.) There were charges against Gates, (although they were finally dropped on Tuesday, which was five days after the incident, and 3.) the cop refused to apologize for the siuation, even after a week, and even after the charges were dropped, and 4.) the cop arrested and handcuffed a 5&#8242;6&#8243;, 150 black man who needs a cane to walk, because he was angry and &#8220;disturbing the peace&#8221; and &#8220;exhibiting loud and tumultuous behavior, in a public place&#8221;.  I don&#8217;t get how someone&#8217;s front porch qualifies as a public place, and since when is being rightfully upset and critical of police action a reason for arrest?<br />
Granted I wasn&#8217;t there, but I don&#8217;t think that was a necessary action for the cop to take.  It was extreme to arrest and handcuff a small black man in his own home after he already proved he was the owner and wasn&#8217;t getting an apology or identification from the cop.  And Crowley is still sticking with &#8220;I won&#8217;t apologize because I don&#8217;t believe I need to apologize for anything.&#8221;  If he admitted he made a mistake and offered an apology, I&#8217;d rethink things, but for now he comes off as an arrogant asshole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Real Civil Rights Movement by admin</title>
		<link>http://tommymarx.com/?p=153&#038;cpage=1#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommymarx.com/?p=153#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Amen and amen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen and amen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Real Civil Rights Movement by dave</title>
		<link>http://tommymarx.com/?p=153&#038;cpage=1#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommymarx.com/?p=153#comment-106</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard this sort of thing from all sides, including from gay people who think undocumented immigrants are the scum of the earth, and then also from immigrant rights activists who feel that gay undocumented immigrants don&#039;t deserve to be offered a pathway to citizenship, only straight families.  This shit needs to stop from all sides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard this sort of thing from all sides, including from gay people who think undocumented immigrants are the scum of the earth, and then also from immigrant rights activists who feel that gay undocumented immigrants don&#8217;t deserve to be offered a pathway to citizenship, only straight families.  This shit needs to stop from all sides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Real Civil Rights Movement by admin</title>
		<link>http://tommymarx.com/?p=153&#038;cpage=1#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 05:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommymarx.com/?p=153#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Dave, I would welcome anything you have to say, even if your comments are &quot;already too long,&quot; as if that was a possibility.

I think it&#039;s wonderful that a person of color became President (and yeah, it bothered me somewhat to refer to President Obama as black, since he&#039;s actually interracial). But I don&#039;t think his ethnicity should shield him from complaints.

And when it comes to equal rights, the whole &quot;I&#039;ve suffered more than you&quot; argument is ridiculous. I have to be honest. What I posted was very toned down from what I originally wrote. I&#039;m not crazy about sports commentators telling me that their civil rights are more important than mine because 150 years ago some people thought slavery was cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, I would welcome anything you have to say, even if your comments are &#8220;already too long,&#8221; as if that was a possibility.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s wonderful that a person of color became President (and yeah, it bothered me somewhat to refer to President Obama as black, since he&#8217;s actually interracial). But I don&#8217;t think his ethnicity should shield him from complaints.</p>
<p>And when it comes to equal rights, the whole &#8220;I&#8217;ve suffered more than you&#8221; argument is ridiculous. I have to be honest. What I posted was very toned down from what I originally wrote. I&#8217;m not crazy about sports commentators telling me that their civil rights are more important than mine because 150 years ago some people thought slavery was cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Real Civil Rights Movement by dave</title>
		<link>http://tommymarx.com/?p=153&#038;cpage=1#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommymarx.com/?p=153#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Interesting article and thoughts.  As a person of color sometimes lost between the black/white dichotomy, I&#039;ve been accused by both sides of being racist, and accused of providing preferential treatment towards each group by the other group when I worked in social services.  I read Granderson&#039;s article and agreed with much of what he said, yet can see how it comes across as smug and/or condescending, and my hope is that was not the intent of Granderson.  When I first saw the catchy slogan &quot;Gay is the New Black&quot;, I saw it for what it was, a catchy slogan, but also knew that it was going to cause a stir and not sit well with minorities, including myself.  And it is annoying for me to see white gays who think they are all enlightened about oppression just because they experience one form of oppression, not realizing that there are some of us in the gay community who experience multiple forms of oppression, and sometimes from people within our so-called lgbtq community.  There are those in the LGBTQ community who are blind to their own racism.  Still, you are right, it is not a contest.  In the end, it would help to not alienate each other, and you&#039;ve helped me to see how this article can alienate.  I would never presume to own a president by his skin color, and suggest that white gays are like petulant children, or that they shouldn&#039;t be dissapointed in, or be critical of Obama.  I too am disappointed by Obama for his failure to keep his campaign promises, but as a person of color, am proud of him for being President.  Definitely wouldn&#039;t have been happier with the other guy.  We have come far, but his presidency in no way means we&#039;ve solved all our race issues.  There is much I want to say, but this is already too long, so I&#039;ll stop, but I think it&#039;s important to not be accusatory to keep up the dialogue about race within the gay community.

Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article and thoughts.  As a person of color sometimes lost between the black/white dichotomy, I&#8217;ve been accused by both sides of being racist, and accused of providing preferential treatment towards each group by the other group when I worked in social services.  I read Granderson&#8217;s article and agreed with much of what he said, yet can see how it comes across as smug and/or condescending, and my hope is that was not the intent of Granderson.  When I first saw the catchy slogan &#8220;Gay is the New Black&#8221;, I saw it for what it was, a catchy slogan, but also knew that it was going to cause a stir and not sit well with minorities, including myself.  And it is annoying for me to see white gays who think they are all enlightened about oppression just because they experience one form of oppression, not realizing that there are some of us in the gay community who experience multiple forms of oppression, and sometimes from people within our so-called lgbtq community.  There are those in the LGBTQ community who are blind to their own racism.  Still, you are right, it is not a contest.  In the end, it would help to not alienate each other, and you&#8217;ve helped me to see how this article can alienate.  I would never presume to own a president by his skin color, and suggest that white gays are like petulant children, or that they shouldn&#8217;t be dissapointed in, or be critical of Obama.  I too am disappointed by Obama for his failure to keep his campaign promises, but as a person of color, am proud of him for being President.  Definitely wouldn&#8217;t have been happier with the other guy.  We have come far, but his presidency in no way means we&#8217;ve solved all our race issues.  There is much I want to say, but this is already too long, so I&#8217;ll stop, but I think it&#8217;s important to not be accusatory to keep up the dialogue about race within the gay community.</p>
<p>Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
